The Science Behind The Window Pain Program
CRPS Is Real. Chronic Pain Is Real. But Real Does Not Mean Permanent.
If you are here, you are probably not looking for another generic explanation of CRPS.
You may have already seen doctors, pain specialists, surgeons, neurologists, physical therapists, psychologists, or alternative providers. You may have tried medications, injections, nerve blocks, ketamine, scrambler therapy, spinal cord stimulators, desensitization, physical therapy, intensive programs, or treatment centers. You may have been told CRPS is permanent, progressive, mysterious, incurable, or something you will simply have to “manage” forever.
I created this page because my work is different.
It is not based on blind positivity.
It is not based on pretending CRPS is simple.
It is not based on ignoring medicine.
It is not based on telling people their pain is imaginary.
It is based on modern pain science, CRPS research, nervous system rehabilitation, emotional processing, graded exposure, functional restoration, and the understanding that pain is produced by a brain and body trying to protect you.
My work is built around one central belief:
Pain is not always a direct measurement of damage. Pain is the nervous system’s best attempt to protect you.
That one distinction changes everything.
CRPS is a serious and complex condition. The pain can be unbearable. The burning, swelling, temperature changes, color changes, allodynia, weakness, tremors, sweating changes, movement problems, and fear are very real. CRPS is recognized in the medical literature as a condition involving severe pain along with sensory, autonomic, motor, and trophic changes, and modern CRPS guidelines emphasize diagnosis, rehabilitation, functional restoration, psychological care, pharmacology, and interventional options rather than one single cure. (PubMed)
But modern pain science also shows us that pain is not produced by the injured body part alone.
Pain is produced by the nervous system as a whole.
That means the brain, spinal cord, immune system, autonomic nervous system, endocrine system, movement system, emotional system, past experiences, stress load, sleep, fear, trauma, and beliefs about the body can all influence pain.
This is not “mind over matter.”
This is not “positive thinking.”
This is not saying pain is imaginary.
This is modern pain science.
My Work in One Sentence
I help people with CRPS and chronic pain understand why their nervous system became protective, reduce the fear and threat around pain, process what their body has been carrying, and gradually teach the brain and body that life is safe again.
My approach combines:
Pain neuroscience education
Graded exposure
Desensitization
Graded motor imagery
Mirror therapy
Movement
Nervous system regulation
Emotional processing
Values-based action
Return to real life
The goal is not to convince people that nothing is wrong.
The goal is to help them understand that their nervous system has become overprotective — and an overprotective nervous system can change.
Why I Understand This Personally and Professionally
I am a Doctor of Physical Therapy, Therapeutic Pain Specialist, and Fellow in Pain Science.
I have worked professionally with complex chronic pain conditions, including CRPS, amplified pain, functional neurological symptoms, pediatric chronic pain, and whole-person pain rehabilitation.
I also lived through CRPS myself.
That combination matters.
I understand CRPS as a clinician.
I understand it as a pain science specialist.
And I understand it as someone who knows what it feels like to fear your own body.
The Window Pain exists because I believe people with CRPS deserve more than fear, more than passive treatment, and more than being told to simply manage symptoms forever.
The Evidence Map Behind My Program
My approach is supported by several overlapping areas of research.
CRPS-specific research
This includes the Budapest Criteria, CRPS diagnostic guidelines, functional restoration, interdisciplinary treatment, autonomic changes, sensory changes, movement changes, and central nervous system involvement.
Pain neuroscience education
This research supports the idea that understanding pain can reduce fear, catastrophizing, disability, and threat, especially when education is combined with active rehabilitation.
Central sensitization and nociplastic pain
This research explains how the nervous system can become overprotective and amplify pain beyond the original injury.
Fear-avoidance and graded exposure
This research explains how fear of movement, touch, activity, and symptoms can maintain disability — and how gradual exposure can rebuild safety.
Graded motor imagery and mirror therapy
This research supports brain-based tools for CRPS, especially when pain has changed the brain’s map of the affected body part.
Emotional processing and trauma-informed pain care
This research supports the role of stress, grief, anger, trauma, people-pleasing, perfectionism, and repressed emotion in chronic pain.
ACT, CBT, and values-based living
This research supports helping people return to meaningful life instead of waiting for symptoms to be perfect.
Medication and procedure research
This research helps explain why opioids, ketamine, bisphosphonates, spinal cord stimulators, DRG stimulators, and amputation require careful, honest discussion.
Imaging and structural findings
This research shows that scans and structural findings do not always explain pain severity or determine prognosis.
What I Believe
I believe CRPS is real.
I believe chronic pain is real.
I believe symptoms like swelling, color changes, temperature changes, burning, allodynia, tremors, weakness, sweating changes, and movement problems are real.
I believe pain can become amplified by a protective nervous system.
I believe emotions, trauma, fear, stress, grief, and repression can influence pain.
I believe the body and mind are not separate.
I believe the nervous system can change.
I believe people can get better even after years of pain.
What I Do Not Believe
I do not believe your pain is fake.
I do not believe CRPS is “just anxiety.”
I do not believe people choose their symptoms.
I do not believe everyone’s pain has the exact same cause.
I do not believe emotions are the only factor.
I do not believe medications or medical care are always bad.
I do not believe healing means ignoring your body.
I do not believe patients should be shamed for being afraid.
The Chronic Pain Protection Cycle
This is the cycle I see over and over again:
Injury, illness, surgery, trauma, or major stressor
↓
Pain begins
↓
Fear increases
↓
Movement decreases
↓
The body becomes more guarded
↓
The nervous system becomes more sensitive
↓
Pain increases
↓
Life gets smaller
↓
The brain sees even more danger
↓
The cycle continues
My program works to reverse that cycle:
Understanding pain
↓
Reducing fear
↓
Safe movement
↓
Emotional processing
↓
Desensitization
↓
Graded exposure
↓
Values-based action
↓
Real-life confidence
↓
The nervous system learns safety
My Core Philosophy
1. Pain Is an Output of the Nervous System
Pain is not simply “sent” from the body to the brain.
The brain and nervous system evaluate information from the body, the environment, memory, emotion, stress, and context, then decide how much protection is needed.
This is why two people can have the same injury and completely different pain experiences.
It is why a person can have a scary MRI and no pain.
It is why phantom limb pain can exist after amputation.
It is why CRPS pain can spread, flare, calm down, move, or change even when the original injury is no longer the only issue.
The International Association for the Study of Pain’s ICD-11 chronic pain classification recognizes chronic pain as something that can be a disease process in itself, not merely a symptom of ongoing tissue damage. Chronic primary pain is recognized as a legitimate category where pain persists and causes distress or disability even when another condition does not fully explain the pain. (PubMed)
That matters because many people with CRPS are still treated as if the only question is:
“What tissue is damaged?”
But with chronic pain, the better question is often:
“What is the nervous system protecting against?”
2. CRPS Is Not Just a Limb Problem
CRPS often begins in a hand, foot, arm, or leg.
But CRPS is not only a hand, foot, arm, or leg problem.
CRPS can involve changes in sensation, movement, blood flow, temperature regulation, swelling, autonomic function, immune activity, body perception, and central nervous system processing. The 5th edition CRPS guidelines emphasize functional restoration and interdisciplinary care, including physical rehabilitation, psychological intervention, medications, and interventional procedures when appropriate. (PubMed)
This is why I do not chase only the painful body part.
I work with the whole person because CRPS affects the whole system.
3. The Nervous System Learns Pain — Which Means It Can Learn Safety
The nervous system is plastic.
It learns from repeated experience.
If every movement, touch, temperature change, emotion, or stressor is interpreted as danger, the nervous system can become better and better at producing pain.
But the opposite is also true.
With the right inputs, the nervous system can learn that movement is safe, touch is safe, emotion is safe, life is safe, and the body is no longer in the same danger it once believed.
This is why my work is not about forcing the body.
It is about carefully teaching safety.
4. Emotional Pain and Physical Pain Are Not Separate Systems
One of the most misunderstood parts of chronic pain is the role of emotion.
When I talk about emotions, trauma, stress, grief, anger, perfectionism, people-pleasing, or repression, I am not saying the pain is fake.
I am not saying it is “just anxiety.”
I am not saying the person caused their condition.
I am saying something very different:
The same nervous system that protects you from physical danger also protects you from emotional danger.
The brain and body do not separate life into neat categories like physical pain, emotional pain, stress, trauma, fear, grief, and anger.
To the nervous system, danger is danger.
If a person has spent years suppressing emotions, ignoring their own needs, living in survival mode, being the strong one, people-pleasing, avoiding conflict, grieving silently, carrying trauma, or feeling trapped in unsafe relationships or environments, the nervous system can become highly sensitized.
For many people with CRPS and other chronic pain conditions, the original injury may have opened the door — but the nervous system’s ongoing sense of threat can help keep the pain alive.
That does not make the pain less real.
It actually makes it make more sense.
Research on chronic pain and trauma supports this whole-person view. A 2024 systematic review found that childhood trauma, PTSD/CPTSD, and chronic pain are connected in complex ways, and that cumulative childhood maltreatment can have long-term effects on both trauma-related symptoms and chronic pain outcomes. (PMC)
5. Repressed Emotions Can Become Nervous System Protection
I do not believe repressed emotions are the only cause of CRPS.
I do not believe every person with CRPS has the same emotional story.
I do not believe trauma has to be present for pain to be real.
But I do believe this:
A nervous system that has spent years surviving, suppressing, pleasing, performing, grieving, fearing, or carrying unresolved stress may become more vulnerable to chronic protection.
Many of the people I work with are not emotionally weak.
They are often the opposite.
They are strong.
They are high-achieving.
They are caregivers.
They are perfectionists.
They are people-pleasers.
They push through everything.
They do not want to burden others.
They have survived more than most people know.
But the body keeps track.
When anger has nowhere to go, grief has nowhere to be held, fear has nowhere to be expressed, and the person constantly overrides their own needs, the nervous system may stay in a state of protection.
Over time, that protection can show up physically.
For some people it becomes CRPS.
For some it becomes fibromyalgia.
For some it becomes chronic fatigue.
For some it becomes migraines.
For some it becomes IBS.
For some it becomes pelvic pain.
For some it becomes dizziness, nausea, burning pain, numbness, weakness, or other chronic symptoms.
This is what I often refer to as the world of “alphabet syndromes.”
Different labels.
Different symptoms.
Different medical pathways.
But often, underneath, there is a nervous system that no longer feels safe.
I do not mean every condition has the same cause. I do not mean every symptom is emotional. I mean that chronic stress, trauma, fear, and emotional suppression can influence the same nervous system that produces pain, regulates blood flow, controls digestion, affects movement, and manages threat.
That is why emotional work can be pain work.
6. The Symptom Is Real, but the Driver May Be Deeper
A major mistake in chronic pain care is assuming that if pain is physical, the cause must be purely physical.
That is not how the nervous system works.
A person can have real swelling, real color changes, real temperature changes, real allodynia, real weakness, real tremors, and real burning pain — while the deeper driver is still nervous system protection.
The brain can create real physical changes through the autonomic nervous system, immune system, endocrine system, vascular system, and motor system.
This is why stress can change heart rate, digestion, sweating, blood flow, muscle tension, inflammation, sleep, hormones, and pain.
So when I ask patients to explore emotion, trauma, stress, identity, fear, resentment, or grief, I am not moving away from the body.
I am going deeper into the body.
7. Education Is Not “Just Information”
Pain education can change fear.
Fear can change protection.
Protection can change pain.
When someone understands why their pain is happening, they often stop interpreting every symptom as proof of damage.
That shift matters because fear, catastrophizing, avoidance, and helplessness can all keep the nervous system on high alert.
Pain neuroscience education is not a motivational speech.
It is a clinical intervention designed to change the meaning of pain.
A systematic review of pain neuroscience education found that it can improve pain, function, disability, psychosocial factors, movement, and healthcare utilization in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. An umbrella review also found that pain neuroscience education is especially valuable when combined with active strategies such as exercise and multimodal rehabilitation. (PubMed)
8. Healing Has to Happen in Real Life
A person may improve inside a clinic, hospital, retreat center, or treatment program but flare again when they return home to the same stressors, relationships, responsibilities, fears, and emotional patterns.
That is why I care so much about real-life integration.
It is not enough for the nervous system to feel safe in a controlled environment.
The nervous system has to learn safety while living your actual life.
That means healing has to include family dynamics, school, work, movement, sleep, relationships, emotions, identity, and the everyday places where the nervous system learned danger in the first place.
9. Medical Treatments Can Help — But They Should Not Be the Whole Plan
I am not anti-medication.
I am not anti-doctor.
I am not anti-treatment.
There are times when medication, procedures, and medical support are appropriate and necessary.
But I am against patients being told that the next medication, injection, infusion, implant, or surgery is the only path forward — especially when they have not been taught how pain works, how fear affects symptoms, how avoidance grows disability, how emotions influence the nervous system, or how to gradually return to life.
CRPS treatment guidelines support interdisciplinary and functional restoration approaches, not a one-size-fits-all procedure model. (PubMed)
That is exactly where my work lives.
Research Deep Dive
1. CRPS Diagnosis, Guidelines, and Functional Restoration
What the research says:
The Budapest Criteria are the most widely accepted clinical criteria for CRPS diagnosis. They assess symptoms and signs across sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor/edema, and motor/trophic categories. The validation study found that the Budapest clinical criteria retained high sensitivity while improving specificity compared with older IASP criteria. (PubMed)
The 5th edition CRPS Practical Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines provide one of the most important clinical frameworks for CRPS care. These guidelines discuss diagnosis, mechanisms, physical rehabilitation, psychological intervention, medications, interventional procedures, and functional restoration. (PubMed)
Why it matters:
I want patients to know that CRPS is real.
It is not made up.
It is not weakness.
It is not “just anxiety.”
But I also want patients to understand that a diagnosis is not a destiny. Diagnosis gives us a name. It should not become a prison.
How this shows up in my program
This is why my work focuses on more than pain reduction.
We work on understanding CRPS, reducing fear, restoring function, rebuilding movement, calming the nervous system, addressing emotional threat, and helping people return to life.
A diagnosis explains what is happening.
It should not decide who you become.
2. Pain Neuroscience Education
What the research says:
Pain neuroscience education teaches people how pain works. It helps patients understand that pain is not always an accurate measurement of tissue damage. A systematic review found that pain neuroscience education can improve pain, function, disability, psychosocial factors, movement, and healthcare utilization in chronic musculoskeletal pain. (PubMed)
An umbrella review found that pain neuroscience education is most useful when combined with other active strategies, especially exercise and multimodal rehabilitation. (Frontiers)
Why it matters:
If you believe every symptom means damage, your nervous system stays on high alert.
If you believe every flare means you are getting worse, your brain sees danger.
If you believe your body is broken, movement feels threatening.
But when you understand that pain can be protection, the meaning of pain begins to change.
Less fear creates more safety.
More safety creates less protection.
Less protection can mean less pain.
How this shows up in my program
This is why the first part of my program focuses heavily on understanding pain, CRPS, central sensitization, fear, and the nervous system before asking you to aggressively change activity.
Education opens the door.
Then we walk through it with movement, desensitization, emotional processing, graded exposure, and real-life practice.
3. Central Sensitization and Nociplastic Pain
What the research says:
Central sensitization describes a nervous system that has become more sensitive and protective. Nijs and colleagues describe central sensitization as an evidence-based explanation for many cases of chronic musculoskeletal pain that cannot be fully explained by tissue damage alone. (PubMed)
The ICD-11 chronic pain classification recognizes that chronic pain can become its own disease process, and chronic primary pain can be diagnosed when pain persists with distress or disability even when another diagnosis does not fully explain it. (PubMed)
Why it matters:
Many people with CRPS experience symptoms that seem impossible:
Light touch hurts.
A breeze hurts.
Water hurts.
Movement hurts.
Stress flares symptoms.
Pain spreads.
The body reacts as if it is under attack.
Central sensitization helps explain this.
The pain is real.
But the system is overprotective.
How this shows up in my program
This is why I teach patients to stop treating every sensation as proof of damage and begin asking:
“What is my nervous system protecting me from?”
Then we use education, graded exposure, desensitization, movement, emotional processing, and nervous system regulation to teach the system a new response.
4. The Biopsychosocial Model
What the research says:
The biopsychosocial model recognizes that chronic pain is influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors. Gatchel and colleagues described the biopsychosocial approach as a major scientific framework for understanding chronic pain, including how psychological and social factors interact with brain and body processes. (PubMed)
Why it matters:
Biopsychosocial does not mean “it is in your head.”
It means pain is influenced by the whole person.
Your biology matters.
Your nervous system matters.
Your immune system matters.
Your sleep matters.
Your stress matters.
Your relationships matter.
Your trauma history matters.
Your beliefs about your body matter.
Your movement matters.
Your life matters.
How this shows up in my program
This is why my program is not just a list of exercises.
Exercise without safety can feel threatening.
Education without action can stay intellectual.
Emotional work without movement may not restore function.
Movement without emotional truth may not address the deeper threat.
The whole system has to be addressed.
5. Fear-Avoidance and Graded Exposure
What the research says:
The fear-avoidance model explains how pain-related fear can lead to avoidance, hypervigilance, disability, depression, and more pain. Vlaeyen and Linton’s foundational work reviewed how pain-related fear can contribute to the maintenance of chronic pain disability. (PubMed)
Why it matters:
Most people with CRPS do not avoid movement because they are lazy.
They avoid movement because their nervous system believes movement is dangerous.
Avoidance makes sense at first.
But over time, it can teach the brain that the body is fragile and life is unsafe.
How this shows up in my program
This is why I use graded exposure.
Not reckless pushing.
Not “no pain, no gain.”
Not forcing people through terror.
Graded exposure means gently and intelligently reintroducing movement, touch, pressure, temperature, exercise, and life in a way the nervous system can learn from.
The goal is not to prove you are tough.
The goal is to prove you are safe.
6. Graded Motor Imagery, Mirror Therapy, and Brain-Body Maps
What the research says:
Moseley’s randomized controlled trial found that graded motor imagery was effective for long-standing CRPS. Graded motor imagery often includes laterality training, imagined movement, and mirror therapy. (PubMed)
A systematic review found that graded motor imagery and mirror therapy may improve pain in CRPS type 1, though the evidence remains limited and more research is needed. (PubMed)
Why it matters:
CRPS can change the brain’s map of the affected limb.
The hand, foot, arm, or leg may feel foreign, distorted, huge, fragile, disconnected, or dangerous.
That is not weakness.
That is altered nervous system processing.
How this shows up in my program
This is why I use laterality, imagined movement, mirror therapy, and other brain-body tools.
Sometimes the first step is not forcing the painful limb to move.
Sometimes the first step is helping the brain see, imagine, feel, and relate to that body part differently.
7. Emotional Processing, Trauma, and Repressed Emotion
What the research says:
Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy, or EAET, is designed to help patients identify, experience, and express avoided emotions. Lumley and Schubiner describe EAET as especially relevant for primary or centralized pain conditions, where psychosocial trauma and internal conflict may contribute to symptoms. (PMC)
A 2024 randomized clinical trial in JAMA Network Open compared EAET with cognitive behavioral therapy in older veterans with chronic pain. EAET produced significantly greater improvements in pain severity, and 63% of EAET participants achieved at least a 30% reduction in pain after treatment compared with 17% in CBT. (PMC)
Why it matters:
This is powerful.
It does not prove that every pain condition is caused by emotion.
It does not prove every person with CRPS has repressed trauma.
But it does support something I see constantly:
Emotional processing can create real changes in physical pain.
Many people with CRPS have spent years being strong, silent, pleasing, performing, grieving, suppressing, or surviving.
The body can carry what the person never had space to feel.
How this shows up in my program
This is why emotional work is part of my pain work.
We look at anger.
We look at grief.
We look at fear.
We look at resentment.
We look at trauma.
We look at identity.
We look at the life the person has been living and the life they actually want.
Not because pain is fake.
Because the nervous system listens to everything.
8. ACT, Values, and Returning to Life
What the research says:
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, or ACT, helps people build psychological flexibility, reconnect with values, and take meaningful action even in the presence of discomfort. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis found ACT improved pain interference, functional impairment, pain acceptance, psychological flexibility, depression, anxiety, and quality of life in chronic pain populations. (PLOS)
Why it matters:
Many people with CRPS wait for pain to disappear before they live again.
I understand why.
But life getting smaller often tells the nervous system that danger is everywhere.
Values-based action helps reverse that.
The person begins to send a new message:
“I am still here.”
“I still have a life.”
“My body is not my prison.”
How this shows up in my program
This is why I ask patients to imagine life beyond pain.
This is why I care about hobbies, relationships, movement, work, parenting, travel, creativity, faith, exercise, and joy.
Returning to life is not the reward after healing.
Returning to life is part of how the nervous system learns safety.
9. Pain Reprocessing and the Threat Value of Pain
What the research says:
Pain Reprocessing Therapy focuses on helping patients reinterpret primary chronic pain as a non-dangerous brain-generated experience rather than proof of ongoing tissue damage. A randomized clinical trial in JAMA Psychiatry found that 66% of participants receiving Pain Reprocessing Therapy were pain-free or nearly pain-free after treatment, compared with 20% in placebo and 10% in usual care. (JAMA Network)
A 2025 five-year follow-up examined the durability of those outcomes, providing longer-term data for the original trial population. (PubMed)
Why it matters:
This research supports one of the most important messages in my work:
Changing the meaning of pain can change pain.
When the brain believes pain equals damage, danger stays high.
When the brain learns that pain can be an overprotective alarm, the threat value of pain can decrease.
How this shows up in my program
This is why I help people reinterpret symptoms without dismissing them.
The pain is real.
But real pain does not always mean real damage.
When the brain learns that distinction, the alarm can begin to quiet.
10. Imaging, Scans, and the Broken Body Myth
What the research says:
A 2015 systematic review found that degenerative spine findings are common in people without back pain and increase with age. Disc degeneration, disc bulges, and other findings can appear in pain-free people. (PubMed)
A 2008 New England Journal of Medicine study found that meniscal tears were common in middle-aged and older adults, including people without knee symptoms. In that study, 61% of people with meniscal tears had not had pain, aching, or stiffness in the previous month. (New England Journal of Medicine)
Why it matters:
Scans can be useful.
But scans can also be terrifying.
Many people read words like degeneration, bulge, tear, arthritis, or “bone on bone” and conclude their body is permanently damaged.
The research tells a more nuanced story.
Structural findings can matter, but they do not always explain pain severity, disability, or prognosis.
How this shows up in my program
This is why I teach patients to stop worshiping the scan.
We do not ignore the body.
But we also do not let an MRI report become an identity.
The body is adaptable.
The nervous system is changeable.
A finding is not a life sentence.
11. Pediatric CRPS and Amplified Pain
What the research says:
A systematic review in Pediatrics found preliminary evidence that intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment can improve disability, pain intensity, and depressive symptoms in children with chronic pain, while also noting limitations in the evidence base. (AAP Publications)
A 2026 pediatric CRPS study described peripheral, central, and mixed phenotypes and reported that intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment reduced CRPS severity and restored function. (NCBI)
Why it matters:
Children and teens with CRPS are often misunderstood.
Their symptoms are real.
But their nervous systems are also highly adaptable.
Pediatric CRPS care often needs to involve function, family dynamics, movement, emotional support, school reintegration, and reducing fear.
How this shows up in my program
When I work with kids or teens, I do not only think about the painful limb.
I think about the child’s world:
Family stress.
School pressure.
Perfectionism.
People-pleasing.
Bullying.
Major transitions.
Loss.
Fear.
Identity.
Independence.
Autonomy.
The goal is not just less pain.
The goal is helping them return to being a kid.
12. Opioids, Hyperalgesia, and Long-Term Medication Caution.
What the research says:
The CDC’s 2022 opioid guideline states that nonopioid therapies are preferred for subacute and chronic pain and that clinicians should maximize nonpharmacologic and nonopioid options when appropriate. It also emphasizes realistic goals for pain and function, risk-benefit discussions, and planning for discontinuation if benefits do not outweigh risks. (CDC)
The FDA added warnings about opioid-induced hyperalgesia, a condition where opioids can cause increased pain or increased sensitivity to pain, including allodynia. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration)
Why it matters:
I am not against opioids in all situations.
But I am against opioids becoming the entire plan.
This is especially important in CRPS because CRPS already involves allodynia and hyperalgesia. If pain worsens while opioids increase, the answer is not always “more opioids.”
Sometimes the pain system may be becoming more sensitive.
How this shows up in my program
I do not manage medications, and patients should never stop medication without medical guidance.
But I do help people understand why long-term medication without a nervous system plan can become limiting.
The goal should always be more function, more clarity, more confidence, and more life.
13. Ketamine, Bisphosphonates, and Pharmacological Treatments
What the research says:
A systematic review of ketamine for CRPS concluded that there was no high-quality evidence available at the time and that the evidence supporting ketamine was weak, although there was rationale for further study. (OUP Academic)
A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis found that bisphosphonates may reduce pain in CRPS type 1, but adverse events were more common and further research was needed. (PubMed)
A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacological treatments for CRPS found that ketamine and bisphosphonate injections appeared among the more promising pharmacological options, while still showing the broader reality that medication evidence for CRPS remains limited and varied. (PubMed)
Why it matters:
Some medications may help some people.
But “may help” is not the same as “complete solution.”
A medication may lower pain temporarily.
That does not automatically rebuild confidence, movement, emotional safety, identity, or a full life.
How this shows up in my program
I want patients to make informed decisions.
If a medical treatment helps create a window of relief, that window should be used to retrain the nervous system, restore function, process fear, and return to life.
Relief is helpful.
But the deeper goal is change.
14. Spinal Cord Stimulators, DRG Stimulators, and Implanted Devices
What the research says:
A Cochrane review of implanted spinal neuromodulation for chronic pain found low- or very-low-certainty evidence across included comparisons and noted complications including infection, lead failure or migration, and reoperation/reimplantation. (Cochrane)
The ACCURATE trial found that DRG stimulation produced higher treatment success than traditional spinal cord stimulation at 3 and 12 months in selected patients with CRPS or causalgia. (PubMed)
A 2023 Cochrane review of spinal cord stimulation for low back pain found that no studies tested whether spinal cord stimulation was better than placebo beyond six months, and 10 of 13 trials had financial ties to manufacturers. (Cochrane)
A placebo-controlled JAMA trial of burst spinal cord stimulation for chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery found no significant difference in back pain-related disability compared with placebo stimulation. (PubMed)
Why it matters:
I am cautious with implanted devices because they are invasive, expensive, and carry real risks.
Some people benefit.
But patients deserve to know the limitations, complications, uncertainty, and financial conflicts in parts of the research before choosing hardware for a nervous system problem.
How this shows up in my program
I am not here to shame anyone who has a stimulator or is considering one.
I am here to ask better questions:
What is the long-term plan?
Will this restore function?
Will this reduce fear?
Will this help the person trust their body?
What are the risks?
What happens if the benefit fades?
Has the person truly been given a nervous-system-based approach first?
15. Amputation and Phantom Limb Pain
What the research says:
A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis found that phantom limb pain affects an estimated 64% of people with amputations. (PubMed)
A systematic review on quality of life after amputation in advanced CRPS found that some selected patients reported improved quality of life, but complications such as phantom limb pain, stump pain, and recurrence were major concerns. (PMC)
A 2025 systematic review of amputation for CRPS evaluated benefits and harms and emphasized the need for caution when considering amputation for a condition that may be driven by nervous system mechanisms rather than only the affected limb. (Brunel University Research Archive)
Why it matters:
I understand why someone with severe CRPS would consider amputation.
When pain is unbearable, removing the painful body part can feel like the only remaining option.
But phantom limb pain proves something important:
Pain is not only in the limb.
The nervous system can continue producing pain even after the limb is gone.
How this shows up in my program
I believe amputation should be treated with extreme caution in CRPS.
If the pain system is still protective, removing the limb may not remove the pain.
The goal should be to change the nervous system, not simply remove the body part it is protecting.
16. Placebo, Nocebo, Expectation, and the Power of Meaning
What the research says:
Pain is shaped by expectation, context, attention, belief, and perceived safety. Placebo and nocebo research shows that the meaning attached to symptoms and treatments can influence pain.
Why it matters:
If a patient is told, “You will have this forever,” that can become a danger message.
If a patient is told, “Your nervous system is protecting you, and protection can change,” that can become a safety message.
Hope is not fake.
Hope is biology.
How this shows up in my program
I am careful with language because language is treatment.
I do not tell people they are broken.
I do not tell people they are doomed.
I do not tell people they are fragile.
I teach people that their symptoms are real, their nervous system is protective, and their body is capable of change.
What the Research Does Not Prove
I believe strongly in this work, but I also want to be honest.
The research does not prove that every person with CRPS has the same mechanism.
It does not prove that emotional repression is the only cause of CRPS.
It does not prove that one exercise, one meditation, one mindset shift, or one therapy technique fixes everyone.
It does not prove that medical treatments are never helpful.
It does not prove that every patient should follow the same path.
What the research does show is that chronic pain is influenced by much more than tissue damage alone.
It shows that pain is shaped by the nervous system, fear, stress, emotion, movement, attention, expectation, trauma, sleep, and meaning.
It shows that active, whole-person approaches are necessary.
That is the foundation of my work.
Common Questions and Concerns
Are you saying CRPS is all in my head?
No.
I am saying pain is produced by the nervous system, and the nervous system includes the brain, spinal cord, immune system, autonomic system, endocrine system, and body.
“Produced by the nervous system” does not mean imaginary.
It means biological.
Are you saying emotions caused my CRPS?
No.
I am saying emotions, trauma, stress, fear, grief, and repression can influence the same nervous system that produces pain.
For some people, these factors are a major part of the story.
For others, they are one piece of a larger picture.
Are you against doctors, medications, or procedures?
No.
I am against fear-based care that gives patients passive treatments without teaching them how pain works or how to rebuild safety, movement, and life.
Can this approach help if I have had CRPS for years?
The nervous system remains capable of change.
Time matters, but it does not make change impossible.
The goal is to work gradually, intelligently, and consistently.
What if my CRPS started from a real injury or surgery?
Most CRPS does.
That does not contradict this approach.
An injury can start the pain, but the nervous system may continue protecting long after the original tissues have healed or stabilized.
What if I still have swelling, color changes, temperature changes, or allodynia?
Those symptoms are real.
They can be part of CRPS.
They also involve nervous system, autonomic, vascular, immune, and inflammatory processes.
A nervous-system-based approach does not deny those symptoms.
It helps explain why they may be happening.
Do I need to stop all medical treatment to do this work?
No.
This work can exist alongside medical care.
The difference is that my approach focuses on helping you become an active participant in changing your pain system, rather than waiting passively for the next treatment to fix you.
Key Research Highlights
CRPS is a recognized clinical condition with validated diagnostic criteria.
CRPS guidelines support interdisciplinary care and functional restoration.
Chronic pain can become a disease process in itself.
Pain neuroscience education can reduce fear and improve function.
Central sensitization explains why normal touch, movement, temperature, or stress can become painful.
Fear-avoidance research explains why avoiding movement can unintentionally increase disability.
Graded motor imagery and mirror therapy have CRPS-specific evidence.
Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy has growing evidence for chronic pain.
ACT supports values-based living and improved psychological flexibility in chronic pain.
Pain Reprocessing Therapy supports the idea that changing the threat value of pain can change pain.
MRI studies show structural findings are common in people without pain.
Opioid research supports caution with long-term use and recognizes opioid-induced hyperalgesia.
Ketamine and bisphosphonates may help selected CRPS patients, but they are not complete solutions.
SCS/DRG research shows possible benefit for selected patients but also uncertainty, complications, and limited long-term evidence.
Amputation research shows pain can continue after limb removal through phantom limb pain, stump pain, or recurrence.
What This Means for You
If you have CRPS, you do not need another person telling you to simply calm down, push through, or learn to live with it.
You need a clear framework.
You need to understand why your pain makes sense.
You need to know why your body is not broken beyond repair.
You need tools that teach your nervous system safety.
You need a plan that includes your body, brain, emotions, movement, identity, and real life.
That is what The Window Pain Program was built to do.
CRPS is real.
Chronic pain is real.
The symptoms are not imaginary.
The person is not weak.
The nervous system is not broken beyond repair.
Pain can become learned.
Pain can become sensitized.
Pain can become protective.
Pain can be shaped by fear, memory, movement, stress, trauma, sleep, attention, expectation, emotion, and meaning.
And because the nervous system can learn pain, it can also learn safety.
I do not believe CRPS has to be a life sentence.
I believe the nervous system can change.
Full Reference List
Apkarian, A. V., Baliki, M. N., & Geha, P. Y. (2009). Towards a theory of chronic pain. Progress in Neurobiology.
Ashar, Y. K., Gordon, A., Schubiner, H., et al. (2022). Effect of pain reprocessing therapy vs placebo and usual care for patients with chronic back pain: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 79(1), 13–23.
Ashar, Y. K., Low, E. L., Knight, K., et al. (2025). Pain reprocessing therapy vs placebo and usual care for patients with chronic back pain: 5-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 82(10), 1049–1051.
Ayyaswamy, B., Saeed, B., Anand, A., Chan, L., & Shetty, V. (2019). Quality of life after amputation in patients with advanced complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review. EFORT Open Reviews, 4(9), 533–540.
Bedson, J., & Croft, P. R. (2008). The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: A systematic search and summary of the literature. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Brinjikji, W., Luetmer, P. H., Comstock, B., et al. (2015). Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36(4), 811–816.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). CDC clinical practice guideline for prescribing opioids for pain — United States, 2022. MMWR Recommendations and Reports.
Chevreau, M., Romand, X., Gaudin, P., Juvin, R., & Baillet, A. (2017). Bisphosphonates for treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials versus placebo. Joint Bone Spine, 84(4), 393–399.
Chou, R., Turner, J. A., Devine, E. B., et al. (2015). The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(4), 276–286.
Connolly, S. B., Prager, J. P., & Harden, R. N. (2015). A systematic review of ketamine for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain Medicine, 16(5), 943–969.
Cuenca-Martínez, F., Suso-Martí, L., Calatayud, J., et al. (2023). Pain neuroscience education in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: An umbrella review. Frontiers in Neuroscience.
Daly, A. E., & Bialocerkowski, A. E. (2009). Does evidence support physiotherapy management of adult Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type one? A systematic review.
Deer, T. R., Levy, R. M., Kramer, J., et al. (2017). Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: A randomized comparative trial. Pain, 158(4), 669–681.
Dimova, V., Randall, E. T., Cao, A., et al. (2026). Clinical phenotypes and the effects of interdisciplinary pain treatment in pediatric Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain Practice, 26(5), e70157.
Englund, M., Guermazi, A., Gale, D., Hunter, D. J., Aliabadi, P., Clancy, M., & Felson, D. T. (2008). Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons. New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 1108–1115.
Food and Drug Administration. (2023). FDA updates prescribing information for all opioid pain medicines to provide additional guidance for safe use.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 581–624.
Gilanyi, Y., Ferraro, M. C., Goebel, A., O’Connell, N. E., Jones, M. D., Sharma, S., Bean, D., Gustin, S. M., & McAuley, J. H. (2025). Amputation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A systematic review. The Journal of Pain.
Harden, R. N., Bruehl, S., Perez, R. S. G. M., et al. (2010). Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria: The Budapest Criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain, 150(2), 268–274.
Harden, R. N., McCabe, C. S., Goebel, A., Massey, M., Suvar, T., Grieve, S., & Bruehl, S. (2022). Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Practical diagnostic and treatment guidelines, 5th edition. Pain Medicine, 23(Suppl 1), S1–S53.
Hara, S., Andresen, H., Solheim, O., et al. (2022). Effect of spinal cord burst stimulation vs placebo stimulation on disability in patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 328(15), 1506–1514.
Hechler, T., Kanstrup, M., Holley, A. L., Simons, L. E., Wicksell, R., Hirschfeld, G., & Zernikow, B. (2015). Systematic review on intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment of children with chronic pain. Pediatrics, 136(1), 115–127.
Jensen, M. C., Brant-Zawadzki, M. N., Obuchowski, N., Modic, M. T., Malkasian, D., & Ross, J. S. (1994). Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 69–73.
Karimov-Zwienenberg, M., Symphor, W., Peraud, W., & Décamps, G. (2024). Childhood trauma, PTSD/CPTSD and chronic pain: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 19(8), e0309332.
Kemler, M. A., et al. (2008). Effect of spinal cord stimulation for chronic Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I: Five-year final follow-up of patients in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Neurosurgery.
Lee, M., Silverman, S. M., Hansen, H., Patel, V. B., & Manchikanti, L. (2011). A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain Physician.
Lepri, B., Romani, D., Storari, L., & Barbari, V. (2023). Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and central sensitization: A systematic review.
Limakatso, K., Bedwell, G. J., Madden, V. J., & Parker, R. (2020). The prevalence and risk factors for phantom limb pain in people with amputations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0240431.
Louw, A., Zimney, K., Puentedura, E. J., & Diener, I. (2016). The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 32(5), 332–355.
Lumley, M. A., & Schubiner, H. (2019). Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy for chronic pain: Rationale, principles, techniques, evidence, and critical review. Current Rheumatology Reports, 21(7), 30.
Méndez-Rebolledo, G., Gatica-Rojas, V., Torres-Cueco, R., Albornoz-Verdugo, M., & Guzmán-Muñoz, E. (2017). Update on the effects of graded motor imagery and mirror therapy on Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1: A systematic review. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 30(3), 441–449.
Moseley, G. L. (2004). Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Pain, 108(1–2), 192–198.
Nicholas, M., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Rief, W., et al. (2019). The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: Chronic primary pain. Pain, 160(1), 28–37.
Nijs, J., van Wilgen, C. P., Van Oosterwijck, J., van Ittersum, M., & Meeus, M. (2011). How to explain central sensitization to patients with “unexplained” chronic musculoskeletal pain: Practice guidelines. Manual Therapy, 16(5), 413–418.
O’Connell, N. E., Ferraro, M. C., Gibson, W., Rice, A. S. C., Vase, L., Coyle, D., & Eccleston, C. (2021). Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Schütze, R., Rees, C., Smith, A., Slater, H., Campbell, J. M., & O’Sullivan, P. (2018). How can we best reduce pain catastrophizing in adults with chronic noncancer pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Pain, 19(3), 233–256.
Traeger, A. C., Gilbert, S. E., Harris, I. A., & Maher, C. G. (2023). Spinal cord stimulation for low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Treede, R. D., Rief, W., Barke, A., et al. (2019). Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain, 160(1), 19–27.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000). Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain, 85(3), 317–332.
Williams, A. C. de C., Fisher, E., Hearn, L., & Eccleston, C. (2020). Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain, excluding headache, in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Yarns, B. C., Jackson, N. J., Alas, A., Melrose, R. J., Lumley, M. A., & Sultzer, D. L. (2024). Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for chronic pain in older veterans: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 7(6), e2415842.
Ye, L., Li, Y., Deng, Q., Zhao, X., Zhong, L., & Yang, L. (2024). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis on psychological outcomes and quality of life. PLOS ONE, 19(6), e0301226.
Zhu, H., Wen, B., Xu, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, L., & Huang, Y. (2024). Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment in patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmaceuticals, 17(6), 811.
